Bloom Energy Valuation Lab: How Many Gigawatts Must Bloom Deliver to Justify Today’s Price?

Lab / Price since the decision

Sell BE NYSE

Loading the latest close

The decision close is below. Prices after it load when this page opens, and only after that session has finished.

Decision close

$236.30 Oct 15, 2026

Latest close

— Last completed close

Later closes

—after the decision date

Move across the chart, or focus it and use the arrow keys. The figure at the top always stays on the latest close.

Exchange close. Dividends, trading costs, taxes, and position size are not included. This is not an account return and not a recommendation. StockAnalysis historical prices

Closes by date

BE close. Change is versus the decision close.

Date	close	Change
Oct 15, 2026	$236.30	—

2026-10-15 $236.30

The recorded stance is Sell at the October 15, 2026 close of $236.30. The chart records completed closes after that date; the model tests the dated FCFF assumptions. Later price movement is feedback, not an automatic score.

THE ARCHIVE / VALUATION LAB

Bloom Energy Corporation Valuation Lab

Focus on common-equity value after actual deliveries, margins, and dilution—not headline GW.

FCFF · REVERSE

PresetsBearBaseBullReset

Decision close$236.302026-10-15

Fair value——

2030 revenue—Model result

2030 EBIT margin—Model output

REVERSE VALUATION

What 2030 delivery volume would support today’s share price?

—

01 / CORE ASSUMPTIONS

2030 delivery scale

Product gross margin

Operating expense ratio

Discount rate

Advanced settings

Equipment revenue / MW

Diluted shares

Terminal growth

The 4.0GW Bull case exceeds announced 2GW capacity and assumes further expansion.

02 / CASH-FLOW BRIDGE

Product + installation revenue

—

Service + electricity revenue

—

EBIT

—

FCFF

—

Common equity value

—

FCFF = NOPAT + D&A − CAPEX − increase in working capital. Customer-deposit growth is not extrapolated into perpetuity.

03 / SENSITIVITY

2030 revenue × EBIT margin per-share sensitivity

Revenue / EBIT	10%	15%	20%	25%

How to use it

The Base case assumes 2.6GW of 2030 deliveries and an 18.8% EBIT margin. Change product gross margin and operating expense ratio one at a time. Revenue growth alone does not guarantee an equivalent increase in FCFF or per-share value.

Then change deliveries. This is annual capacity actually delivered and recognized as revenue—not maximum option capacity in an announcement. The 4.0GW Bull case is above announced 2GW capacity, so it requires additional expansion, yield, and demand.

Finally, read the reverse result as an expectation test. It does not say the market literally forecasts one delivery number; it shows how large the combined assumptions must become if other inputs stay fixed.

Limits

First-half operating cash flow includes material customer-deposit/deferred-revenue and payable movements. The model does not repeat those timing effects as perpetual cash flow. Stack life, project pricing, exact service contracts, and convertible-security details are not fully public, so precision should not be confused with certainty.

Read the research article for contract certainty, customer concentration, Oracle warrant economics, and competitive risks.