Lab / Price since the decision
Sell STRL NASDAQ
Loading the latest close
The decision close is below. Prices after it load when this page opens, and only after that session has finished.
- Decision adjusted close
- $564.00 Oct 6, 2026
- Latest adjusted close
- — Last completed close
- Later closes
- —after the decision date
Move across the chart, or focus it and use the arrow keys. The figure at the top always stays on the latest close.
Adjusted close. Splits and dividends are in the price series. Trading costs, taxes, and position size are not. This is not an account return and not a recommendation. Yahoo Finance
Closes by date
| Date | adjusted close | Change |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 6, 2026 | $564.00 | — |
2026-10-06 $564.00
This page turns the Sterling Infrastructure analysis into a two-way model. Enter growth to get fair value, or start from the market price and solve for the growth that price requires.
The defaults reproduce the article’s Base case. E-Infrastructure grows 20% annually from the author-estimated 2026 starting point, the other businesses grow 2%, and adjusted EBITDA margin reaches 21.5% in 2030. A 24x exit P/E and 10% required return produce a present value of about $568. These are author assumptions, not company guidance.
Read fair value and implied growth together
THE ARCHIVE / VALUATION LAB
Sterling Infrastructure Valuation Lab
Enter growth to calculate fair value, then reverse the model to see what growth the current price requires.
E-Infrastructure growth required by today’s price
19.7% annually with the other Base assumptions and a 24x exit P/E
Change growth, margin, and multiple
Advanced depreciation, tax, and share assumptions
From revenue to adjusted EPS
- E-Infrastructure
- $6.37B
- Other revenue
- $1.09B
- Total revenue
- $7.45B
- Adjusted EBITDA
- $1.60B
- Depreciation
- −$0.13B
- Adjusted net income / EPS
- $1.10B / $$35.41
Net interest income is held at zero.
Present value across growth and EBITDA margin
All other assumptions stay at their selected values. The dot marks the nearest cell.
| CAGR margin | 18.5% | 20.0% | 21.5% | 23.0% | 24.5% |
|---|
What today’s price requires in 2030
Educational scenario calculator · This is not a probability simulation or investment advice. It starts from the midpoint of 2026 guidance and an author-estimated segment split. The current price is the October 6, 2026 close.
Why reverse-solving matters
The fact that the data-center market is growing does not prove the stock is cheap. A good business can offer a low expected return if the share price already discounts fast growth and strong margins.
The forward model shows the value produced by selected assumptions. The reverse model changes the question: To earn 10% annually from today’s price, what EPS must Sterling produce in 2030, and how fast must E-Infrastructure grow to produce it?
Model mechanics
The two revenue pools compound separately for four years from their estimated 2026 starting points.
The model applies the selected EBITDA margin, subtracts depreciation, and applies tax to calculate adjusted EPS. Net interest income is held at zero.
A bisection solver finds the E-Infrastructure CAGR that makes present value equal the $563.69 market price. That result is not the market’s single expectation. The same price can be explained by lower growth and a higher multiple, or higher growth and a lower multiple. The sensitivity table makes those trade-offs visible.
What this model does not answer
- Future acquisitions and their dilution or debt financing
- Different margins for site development and electrical work inside E-Infrastructure
- Customer concentration, project delays, and power-interconnection timing
- The exact timing of backlog conversion into revenue
- The data-center construction cycle beyond 2030
The point is to separate “it grows” from “it is cheap.” Start with the growth required by the current price, then judge whether that number is plausible given Sterling’s capacity and execution.
Disclosure: This tool documents a personal investment-research process and is not investment advice. Fair value and implied growth are author estimates based on assumptions, and actual outcomes may differ materially.
Discussion
Discussion
Have a question, correction, counterexample, or another interpretation?